Fund name: Croft Value (CLVFX)
Objective: They seek long-term growth with
managed risk. The managers describe
themselves this way: “We seek to buy stocks at ‘80-cents-on-the-dollar’ and
hold them for at least 3-5 years. We believe this offers our investors the
potential for higher returns with lower risk. Reduced risk is inherent in our
investment philosophy.” The fund is
flexible and will purchase stocks of different market caps (45% is currently in
mid- to small-cap stocks), across a wide variety of style-boxes. About 11% is invested overseas.
Adviser:
Croft-Leominster, a Baltimore-based manager “with a wealth of
experience. The Croft-Leominster management team has over 100 years collective
experience and national clientele.” The firm manages more than $600 million in
separately managed portfolios as well as two funds, Value and Income. There is a Castle Croft (“ a 17th century
stone quadrangular manor house, built close to the site of the old medieval
castle” according to the official Castle website for the UK) near Leominster
(pronounced “Lemster”) in England. The fact that not even the staff at the
advisor can pronounce it correctly may explain why the Crofts are transitioning
away from “Croft-Leominster Value” to “Croft Value.”
Manager: Gordon, Kent, and Russell. The senior Mr. Croft, Gordon, worked for T.
Rowe Price from ’67-‘89 and was a director of the firm. He co-founded Croft-Leominster in 1989 and
has managed the fund since inception. Kent
Croft worked for Salomon Brothers before co-founding the advisor with his
father. He has also managed the fund
since inception. Russell Croft joined the
team in 2006 after working a while for Gabelli Asset
Management.
Management’s Stake in the Fund: The senior Mr. Croft
has between $500,000 and a million in the Value Fund, each of the junior Messrs
Croft have between $100,000 and 500,000.
In addition, the managers collectively own 71% of the fund’s advisor.
Opening date:
Minimum investment: $2000 for regular
accounts, $500 for IRAs. The fund is
available for purchase in all states.
Expense ratio: 1.49% on assets of $23
million. The expense ratio was reduced by two basis points on
Comments: I don’t know whether, as is the case
with many of the Stars in the Shadows, this mutual fund started out as a
“friends and family” operation. It
certainly occupies a tiny niche at Croft-Leominster, and represents less than 4%
of the firm’s assets under management.
That would usually signal that this was opened as a service to their
existing clients, rather than as a stand-alone offering.
The
managers articulate a sensible, unexceptional strategy:
Over a year's time, we may consider more than 1000 stock ideas. These originate from inside the firm or arrive through a variety of external experts and research firms. We have a staff of analysts and get stock ideas from other money managers we respect (our network of 'deep-thinkers'), independent research firms and Wall Street analysts.
· We whittle these down to roughly 500 by looking for acceptable valuations. We use traditional valuation measures such as price-to-earnings ratios, but also look for strong cash flow, quality assets, and a potential for growth that are not reflected in current stock price.
· We narrow the list to 200 stocks that we continuously monitor focusing on companies that offer:
1. A catalyst for growth
2. Growth at a reasonable price
3. Contrarian plays
· Our portfolio represents the 80 or so best ideas of the above.
As a
result, the term “Value” in the fund name should be read as “relative value” in
about the sense that Bill Miller uses in explaining why Legg Mason Value was
buying Amazon and Google. That
relativism is borne out when we look at Croft Value’s portfolio. By Morningstar’s calculation:
The key
seems to be good execution. The managers
have parlayed an unexceptional strategy into very exceptional performance:
Despite
risk-consciousness on the managers’ part, Morningstar ranks this as a “high
risk – high return” fund, though the return has outweighed the risk by enough
to earn it four- and five-star ratings from Morningstar. The problem with such judgments is that
Croft’s portfolio doesn’t track any index very closely, so comparisons that
presuppose high correlations (for example, beta measures are reliable only when
R-squared correlations are high) tend not be very helpful. The fund’s beta is higher than the S&P’s (though the r-squared is just 69) and the beta is
noticeably lower than the mid-cap average (though the r-squared is just
78).
The
fund had one bad year. It lost almost
26% in 2002, about 3.5% worse than the S&P or its peers. I’m not at all troubled by that single year’s
performance, though I am perplexed by my inability to locate a shareholder
report in which the managers explain it.
The annual reports are not available on the firm’s website and the
reports filed with the SEC seem to skip over their relatively weak performance
in the second half of the year.
Bottom Line: This is, on whole, a strong, sensible
core fund. Assets in the fund have
quadrupled since 2003, but the asset base remains very modest and steady
inflows should give the managers cash to deploy as the market offers up
opportunities.
Fund website: http://www.croftleo.com/